Shariah Governance in Islamic Banking Industry: A Critical Review

Transcription

1. Shar ī‘ah Governance in Islamic Banking Industry: A Critical Review Waqar Ahmad1 Abstract: The SG is a topic attracting great interest of the researchers of banking industry of Islam. The Sharī‘ah supervision is playing an important rather essential role in the governing the Islamic banks. Supervision of the Sharī‘ah Board and consistency in rule of Sharī‘ah are to be considered as mandatory components of an effective and efficient structure of Sharī‘ah Governance. The Sharī‘ah Council (SC), which is specific to Islamic banks, is considered to be the most important part of the SG framework. Since Islamic FI is similar in many ways to conventional FI, the existence of a good corporate governance framework is imperative. But unlike conventional FI, Islamic FI is responsible to guarantee compliance of the principles of Sharī‘ah in products of the Islamic Financial Institution and other operational management. The study will also addresses the issues of accountability/Sharī‘ah Audit and role of Sharī‘ah Supervisory Board in Islamic financial institutions in Pakistan and Malaysia. The purpose of this document is to examine and evaluate the critical assessment of SG in the Islamic banking sector. This paper infers after comparing different SGF that BNM provides a better way out. We find out that IFIs in Pakistan and Malaysia are under better SG. Key Words: Sharī‘ah Governance (SG), SBP,AAOFI, BNM, Pakistan, Islamic Banking and Finance Industry 1. Introduction: The stability of the system of Islamic finance depends upon one of its integral parts i.e the Sharī‘ah Governance. The institutionalization of a durable Sharī‘ah management system enhances general public confidence in the Islamic financial institutions. The Islamic financial industry has grown considerably in recent decades and is penetrating Muslim societies, but surprisingly the same is also popular in non-Muslim states. The system of SG consists of a series of institutional, administrative and organizational agreements through which an IFI guarantees effective independent control of Sharī‘ah law's compliance with structures and processes mentioned herein below: a) Share information about such Sharī‘ah statements or decisions with IFIS operational personnel, who oversee daily compliance with Sharī‘ah decisions regarding each business level and transaction. However, this is usually done by Sharr`iah's internal compliance department. b) A compliance check or an internal Sharī‘ah audit signals that if there is an incident of non-compliance, it must be recorded, processed and corrected. In this regard, IFSB-3 explains that the Sharī‘ah resolution, issued by Sharī‘ah council, must be strictly observed. c) An annual assessment or audit of the Sharī‘ah to check whether the Sharī‘ah evaluation or internal audit has been properly performed and whether the findings have been duly noted by the Sharī‘ah advisor. " 1 LLM Corporate Law Scholar, Department of Law, Faculty of Shar’iah & Law, International Islamic University, Islamabad
2. There is a dramatic spread of Islamic banking industry over the past four decades , this industry has spread across the globe including Europe and North America. Similarly this industry has also a wide spread in Asia and Africa. A total contribution of Islamic Banking is 71% in Islamic finance sector, the total assets of the Islamic banks in approx. USD 1.72 T. The sector has the backing of various commercial, wholesale and other banks. However, the commercial banking system continues to be the main contributor to the growth of the sector. In year 2017, there were more or less 207 windows of Islamic banking in conventional banks and the total of Islamic banks was 505. There are 16 Islamic Banks and windows in KSA, the second largest Islamic Finance market, behind the smaller markets in UAE and Malaysia [Global Islamic Finance Market Growth, Trends, and Forecast (2018 – 2024)].2 These represent around 93% of the sector's assets, having an estimated value of USD 920 B in 2015 (World Islamic Banking Competitiveness Report 2016 see also Islamic Financial Services Industry Stability Report 2016 and The Financial Bank's Financial Development Report 2014). Islamic banking has grown faster in recent years than conventional banking worldwide (The Moody's Report 2016 on Islamic Banks). The Islamic bank could soon become the first choice for the majority of the 1.5 billion Muslims worldwide. In Pakistan, since 2002, the Islamic banking sector has absorbed around 15% of the country's total commercial banks. Islamic banking in Pakistan increased to Rs. 2,790 million at the end of March 2019, showing an increase of Rs. 132 billion in the January-March 2019 quarter (Abdul Rafay, 2020). However, Islamic companies and community groups are increasingly concerned with Islamic banks taking rigorous research and development initiatives to develop a wide range of truly effective products that comply with Sharī‘ah. This article examines the strategic role of Sharī‘ah governance in the development of contemporary Islamic banking theory and practice worldwide. This research report uses descriptive analytical techniques to examine the published data available in the annual reports and websites of Islamic banks. There are nine parts of this paper. Preliminary part introduces the concepts, Part 2 provides with a concise overview of the literature on Sharī‘ah norms and practiced in Islamic banking. The third part examines the most important theory of Islamic banking or model of Islamic banking by the Sharī‘ah point of view. Part 4 analyzes the importance of SG in Islamic banking & finance around the world. Part 5 compares different SG Frameworks. Part 6 examines the models of SG of some selected countries related to Islamic banks in operating on Islamic lines. Part 7 provides a brief summary of propositions for better SG where the way forward in SG in Islamic finance industry. Part 8 analyzes the Sharī‘ah advisory Council vis-à-vis Sharī‘ah supervisory board of Islamic FI. Part 9 concludes this paper. 1.1. Sharī‘ah Governance: Concept Construction. The SG is still a new concept, rarely comprehensive definitions of the concept are available. It is pertinent to understand the concept of SG because it is essential to have clear picture of its definition and concept.(Ayub, Khan, Rashid, Shahzad, & Rehman, 2019; Shahzad, 2016; Shahzad & Khan, 2015) So as to understand Sharī‘ah Governance, first, we have to define Corporate Governance as they exist next to each other in Islamic Banks (IBs). (Shahzad & Rehman, 2017) The OECD has characterized Corporate Governance as the "arrangement of connections between an organization's administration, its board, its partners and different partners" (OECD, 1999) 2 The "Global Islamic Finance Market Growth, Trends, and Forecast (2018 - 2024)" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com 2
3. The AAOFI SG standard have discussed its standards without defining SG (Banerjee, 2010). CBM (Central Bank Malaysia) has provided with the purpose of SG and also lacks the definition of SG. The purpose of SG set forth by CBM is that the purpose of SG is to formulate administrations to secure after half of the Sharī‘ah law foundation and give the roaming committee and the management when performing their duties in connection with the Sharī‘ah including for guidelines on issues related to the Sharī‘ah review, etc. To the best of our knowledge and research, there is only the exact-minded, responsive definition of Sharī‘ah meaning IFSB (2009) sold the most relevant definitions and defined it as "a set of institutional and organizational arrangements through which an IFS ensures and effectively Independent monitoring of Sharī‘ah compliance between each and every process: Publication of relevant Sharī‘ah declarations / resolutions; a) Providing information on such Sharī‘ah statements / decisions to IFS operating personnel who oversee daily compliance with Sharī‘ah statements / decisions at each level of the operation and transaction; b) An internal review / review of Sharī‘ah compliance to ensure that Sharī‘ah compliance has been followed, with each failure to be recorded and reported, and remedied and corrected where possible c) An annual assessment / review has been properly conducted and its results have been properly celebrated by the Sharī‘ah Council." 2. Literature Review: Islamic banks work under the steady direction and observation of the Islamic Sharī‘ah Board. A number of researches have enrolled genuine worries over the expanding Sharī‘ah violations in the Islamic financial industry since its beginning. Few scholars have observed that loaning and lending practices at Islamic banks are to a great extent dependent on mechanism provded by conventional banks. Islamic banks depend on showcase loan costs and limiting tables to decide return on their financing and speculation instruments (El Diwany and Ahmad Haron 2006, 2000, Kaleem through the establishment, 2003). For instance, Islamic banks utilize the LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate) to decide the cost of Murabahah financing, and open speculation (Khan, 2010). They charge higher rate of returns on their long-term financing and loans. They throw all insurance and operating costs upon their customers to ensure almost fixed and risk-free returns on their financing contracts (Bashir, 1999). Following the principle: “pay presently, pay less head”, Islamic banks oblige their customers to purchase the guaranteed murabaha merchandise or repay them for all harms and misfortunes caused because of the break of guarantee. They recoup all fines and extra charges from their clients for late installments and defaults. What's more, as a matter of course and without charge punishments for late installments and defaults to clients (Khan and Bhatti, 2008). These banks give nearly foreordained and risk-free returns for their saving and terms deposits and investments (Azmat, mrwotzup and Brown, 2015). Various Islamic banking academics hold that Islamic banks just use premium and LIBOR rates as a benchmark or manual for foreordain the pace of profits on their financing and venture items. Islamic banks might be legitimized to utilize the regular undertaking examination strategies to evaluate profits or benefit for their items as they just utilize these factual figures as a guide. Nienhaus (1983) firmly exhorted that Islamic banks use showcase loan fees to figure the benefit sharing proportions. Islamic banks are abusing Sharī‘ah standards as well as productive market rules. They depend on loan fees to esteem their murabaha venture portfolios yet they may not be appropriately supported against the 3
4. financing cost chance by utilizing ordinary supporting instruments , for example, advances, prospects, trades and alternatives, which depend on betting and theories. The Islamic financial hypothesis and practice in Pakistan is the most basic scene of Islamic financial development around the world. The Federal Sharī‘ah Court Judgment 1991 and Supreme Court Judgment 1999 held that Islamic financial practice in Pakistan was an intrigue based action. The historical backdrop of governance regarding corporation can be followed back to Watergate scam during Nixon administration in the US. In any case, the term corporate governance picked up consideration of strategy producers and analysts after different prominent budgetary embarrassments and business disappointments, for example, Enron and WorldCom in the US. There was not a solitary method of portraying a firm and clarifying the job of governance inside it. Shleifer and Vishny (1997) clarify corporate governance in the routes through which providers of fund to enterprises guarantee themselves of getting an arrival on their venture. An increasingly complete meaning of corporate governance is given by John and Senbet (1998) which manages components by which partners of an enterprise practice command over corporate insiders and the executives with the end goal that their advantages are secured. They incorporate partners, debenture holders and even non-monetary partners, for example, representatives, providers, clients, and other invested individuals. As indicated by Hassan and Christopher (2005), corporate governance may allude into two senses. One can be characterized as a conventional framework in of obligation of upper level in the board to investor while the subsequent one is the social duty of the executives from entire point of view, depicted as formal to casual exercises of organization. In Islamic point of view, there are relatively few contrasts with respect to the exercises of a corporate association, anyway a few exercises would obviously recognize the Islamic firms from regular associations. Hasan (2013) gives quantities of literature including the corporate governance structures of Islamic associations and how those vary from ordinary association's governance models. He contended that the Islamic corporate governance model can be recognized by "the parts of episteme, corporate goal, the idea of the executives, the administration board and the capitalrelated possession structure." Haqqi (2014) contends that corporate governance for IFIs is one of a kind as it relies upon two fundamental approaches. First one is religious that commands lead of the business as per Sharī'ah standards. Though the subsequent one identifies with benefit intention dependent on amplification of investor's wealth. Haqqi (2014) also argued that Sharī'ah governance is as much significant as corporate governance and it is the idea used to assess the consistence of monetary exchanges of Islamic money related industry with Sharī'ah decisions and standards so as to guarantee the certainty of Islamic account industry according to its partners. Sharī'ah governance is a comprehensive framework which gives not just the rules to consistence of practices of Islamic banking with Sharī'ah, yet it likewise gives a nitty gritty system of responsibilities and duties of all the concerned partners of this division.(Shahzad, Khan, Mansoori, & Ehsan, 2020; Shahzad, Rehman, Saeed, & Ehsan, 2019; Shahzad & Khan, 2019) In IFIs, Sharī'ah governance generally alludes to the administration, constitution, and affairs of the Sharī'ah committee (Shaharuddin, 2011). Upright Sharī'ah governance ensures the dynamicity of growth of IFIs. A definitive purpose of Sharī'ah governance and all 4
5. the departments which appears due to Shar ī'ah governance in IFis is to guarantee Sharī'ah consistence to its tasks and items (Hasan, 2007). 3. Theory of Islamic Banking – Islamic Banking Model: Islamic financial matters is anticipating business and monetary exchanges coming about because of value and hazard sharing, common assets and investment to stand up to advance more noteworthy financial effort, the conveyance of equity and general fellowship. The Islamic vision of financial equity is an assault on the end of interests, tests, theory, and different components of human political inception. Islamic readings are primarily composed on the division of hazard or portfolio in the loss of Mudarabah pay and assume the job of coordinating players (savers) and account holders (financial specialists). Murabaha, Ijarah, sound Salam and bai Istisna likewise go about as auxiliary instruments that are not identified with the act of ability and thought. This uses Qard-e-Hasanah or free credits for poor people and destitute. 4. Importance of SG in Islamic banking & finance: 4.1. Sharī‘ah compliance is the backbone of Islamic banking & finance: It offers authenticity to the acts of Islamic banking and money. It expands the trust of investors and the open that all training and movement relies upon Sharī‘ah consistently. The nearness of components that are contradictory with Sharī‘ah won't just influence open trust in Islamic banks and money. Yet, it can likewise open the hazard to Islamic FI, for instance, legitimate hazard and notoriety. Consistence with Sharī‘ah standards can be accomplished with a suitable Sharī‘ah administration structure. 5. Sharī‘ah Governance Framework: A comparison. So as to have a reasonable thought regarding contrasts in SG practice over the locale and nations, a relative investigation is utilized in this segment. Kasim et al. (2013) look at AAOIFI, IFSB and BNM Sharī‘ah Governance rules and contend that all the rules talk about and accentuate on freedom, skill, duty, responsibility, classification of Sharī‘ah board individuals, likewise, the significance of Sharī‘ah survey and review capacities is featured in all the rules in spite of the fact that AAOIFI talk about in more detail, Sharī‘ah hazard the board and examination work have been examined distinctly in BNM Sharī‘ah Governance system (Kasim et al., 2013). The distinction between the IFSB Prudential Standards and the AAOIFI Governance Norms is that the IFSB approach is increasingly worried towards controllers while the AAOIFI, to individual IFIs. Sharī‘ah Governance system gave by AAOIFI has seven areas, the structure of IFSB incorporates degree and approach of SG framework and the subjective qualities of Sharī‘ah Supervisory Committee, at the equivalent time, BNM gives the overall necessities of the structure, subjective attributes and give the rules on Sharī‘ah survey and Sharī‘ah review, in expansion to that, BNM gives the rule on the elements of Sharī‘ah chance the board and Sharī‘ah research in Islamic Finance (Kasim et al., 2013). As Sharī‘ah Governance is new, they recommend that separate controllers should actualize the prescriptive methodology like the principal approach taken by the U.K while executing the corporate governance code. They close by proposing normalized and thorough rule or system for simple reference for industry experts, controllers, Sharī‘ah counselors and financial specialists. Table 1: SG Guidelines: a comparison (Uddin, 2018) 5
6. Description SG Definition Independence of SSB discussed , yes or no? Competence of SSB discussed, yes or no? Responsibilities of SSB discussed, yes or no? Sharī‘ah Review discussed, yes or no? Sharī‘ah Audit discussed, yes or no? Risk management discussed, yes or no? Research Functions discussed, yes or no? AAOIFI3 No Yes Yes Yes IFSB4 Yes Yes Yes Yes BNM5 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes 6. SG Models: Selected Markets: A selective study of following will be analyzed hereunder. i. ii. iii. iv. v. vi. Malaysia Pakistan Bahrain Kuwait Qatar U.A.E. 6.1. Malaysia Model:  Section 16B of the CBA, 19586 created the Sharī‘ah Advisory Council at Bank Negara Malaysia.  The Council is the final retreat for Islamic banking, strategic issues, matters of the Islamic finance, financial matters related to Islamic development or whatever other business that depends on the standards of Sharī‘ah law and is observed and controlled by Bank Negara Malaysia.  BNM's council is carefully coordinated by the court or arbitrator in disputes related with Sharī‘ah issues in the Islamic banking and financial segment.  CSC`s decision is binding upon the arbitrator and advisory for the court.  The BNM has also published "Guidelines for Governance of the Sharī‘ah Committee for Islamic Financial Institutions (BNM / GPS1)", which stipulate the following:  That a SC is to be established at each IFI. All the SCs shall have to play a complementary role to the SAC. 3 Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions is an NGO based in Bahrain aiming to maintain Shariah Standards. 4 Islamic Financial Services Board is an international body to set standards for regulation of IFIs. It is based in Kuala Lumpur, capital of Malaysia. 5 Central Bank of Malaysia 6 The Central Bank of Malaysia (CBA) Act of 1958. 6
7. 6 .1.1. Restrictions imposed:  The Members of SC of on IFI of on industry is restricted not to be part of any other SC of the same industry, moreover, members of SAC of BNM are not allowed to be a part of any other SC of any other IFI. 6.2. Pakistani model:  There shall be a SB at SBP, which shall be the only authority in all issues concerning IF.  Every IFI is required to set up an S Advisor.  SB members are free to be SA of any IFI. (unlike BNM Model) 6.2.1. Restriction imposed:  One person cannot be SA of more than one IFIs. 6.3. 7 Kuwait model  In Kuwait, there is a framework of self-regulation.  There is no SAC at the Central Bank of Kuwait.  Every IFI is required to establish its own Sharī‘ah Supervisory board.7  In case of conflict among the members of SSB, the matter shall be forwarded to “Fatwa Board” established under Auqaf Ministry by the Board of Directors and in all that matter “Fatwa Board” shall be the ultimate authority. The “Fatwa Board” is final external of CBK.  No legal restriction is present in the law/ rules.  From the current practice, it tends to be said that there is no limitation for the individuals from the "Fatwa Board" to serve in any IFI. Section 10, Chapter 3, Central Bank of Kuwait Law 7
8. Market Malaysia Pakistan Kuwait Bahrain U .A.E Qatar Authority in Sharī‘ah Prevailing Authority Restrictions imposed Matters upon members External Internal, by the by the IFI. Central Bank SAC SC The authority of BNM 1. A member can only will prevail thus SAC is either be member of ultimate authority SAC or any SC. 2. A member cannot serve into two SC`s of the same finance industry. SB SA Same like Malaysia, 1. A Sharī‘ah Advisor SBP`s SB will be the can serve in only one ultimate authority. IFI (no categorization mentioned). N/A SSB SSB is the sole authority N/A yet if any issue is not settled then the same shall be put before the “Fatwa Board” of the Auqaf Ministry and in that case Fatwa Board will be the final authority. HSA SSA HSA N/A NSB  SSC SSB NSB N/A There is no mechanism to send the matter to the SSC, Though there is no Sharī‘ah Defender at the Central Bank of Qatar yet in case of any problem it use to appoint Sharī‘ah Scientists to solve the problem who shall be the ultimate authority. Likewise, there is no such restriction upon SSB members to serve in the any IFI. 6.4. Bahrain Model:  There is a National Sharī‘ah Council at Central Bank Bahrain to ensure and assure the compliance of Sharī‘ah only for its own products. 8
9.  All other Islamic financial institutions must establish a “Sharī‘ah Supervisory Committee” and adhere to the management standards of Islamic financial institutions AAOIFI no. 1 and no. 2 compliant.  There isn`t any restriction upon member of NSC to be a part of any other IFI.  No restrictions on the member of the National Sharī‘ah Council to serve a financial institution, and no restrictions on a single institution. 6.5. U.A.E. model:  The creation of a "High Authority of Sharī‘ah" for the supervision of Islamic banks, financial institutions and investment firms (art. 5, federal law n ° 6 of 1985).  The authority shall be the ultimate Sharī‘ah authority in Islamic Financial matters.  Establishment of the Sharī‘ah Supervisory Authority at the level of financial institutions.  No restriction is mentioned. 6.6.     Qatar model: There is self-regulation by Islamic banks. No Sharī‘ah defender at the Central Bank of Qatar. There is no mechanism to send any matter to SSC. The Central Bank of Qatar appoints Sharī‘ah scientists to solve any problem. 7. Scope of surveillance function: It is necessary to focus on Sharī‘ah monitoring of macros and micro analysis of Islamic operations and practices. It should not only be limited to the process of product development and its review, but also to the banking and behavioral practices of the entire Islamic finance ministry. It is worth noting that although almost all SSBs have access to ex-Sharī‘ah judiciary, the practice of pre-Sharī‘ah judiciary is something that SSBs consider / overlook in depth from certain Islamic financial institutions. Will become. 8. Internal and external studies / Sharī‘ah review: • Conduct internal and external studies of Sharī‘ah compliance. • To place sufficient emphasis and focus more on the implementation of Sharī‘ah compliance ex-post. • Collaborate closely between the audit committee and the internal auditors / Sharī‘ah and the external auditors to enhance the external auditors' ability to perform Sharī‘ah compliance audits in the context of audit work. • You need a format to confirm Sharī‘ah compliance. 9. Sharī‘ah Governance regulations: 9.1 Sharī‘ah governance standards issued by AAOIF: The Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions has issued 7 standards on Sharī‘ah governance for Islamic Financial Institution. 1. Sharī‘ah Supervisory Board: Appointment, Composition and Report, 2. Sharī‘ah Review, 3. Internal Sharī‘ah Review, 9
10. 4 . Audit & Governance Committee for Islamic Financial Institutions, 5. Independence of Sharī‘ah Supervisory Boards, 6. Statement on Governance Principles for Islamic Financial Institutions, 7. Corporate Social Responsibility Conduct and Disclosure for Islamic Financial. 9.2 Sharī‘ah governance standard issued by state bank of Pakistan: • The Compliance with the principles of Sharī‘ah According to the Holy Quran and the Sunnah is the essence of Islamic banking industry. A sound and effective Sharī‘ah compliance framework is thus critically important to give confidence to the general public about Sharī‘ah conformity of Islamic Banking Institutions (IBIs)‟ products and services. To ensure the operation of the Islamic Financial Institutions compliance with the rules and principles of Sharī‘ah the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) issues regulations time to time since the re-launch of Islamic Banking in Pakistan. • In 2008 SBP issued Sharī‘ah Compliance guidelines for IBIs. However keeping in view the recent developments in the Islamic banking industry, a comprehensive Sharī‘ah Governance Framework has been issued. The framework is be applicable to all IBIs. • The main objective of this Sharī‘ah Governance framework is to strengthen Sharī‘ah compliance in the IBIs and to define the roles and responsibilities of the Board of Directors, management, Sharī‘ah Supervisory Board, Sharī‘ah Compliance Department (SCD) and internal and external auditors towards Sharī‘ah compliance. 9.3 Sharī‘ah governance guidelines issued by islamic financial services board (IFSB) • The Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB) is an international stander setting institutions which issues standards and guiding principles for Islamic Financial Institutions to strengthen governance structures and processes in the Islamic financial services industry in line with its mandate to promote soundness and stability of the Islamic financial system. The IFSB Council, during its ninth meeting in Jeddah, approved the preparation of a set of comprehensive Guiding Principles on the Sharī‘ah governance system, which provides guidelines regarding Sharī‘ah audit/review process for compliance with Sharī‘ah rulings; and harmonization of the Sharī‘ah governance structures and procedures. 9.4 Sharī‘ah governance framework issued by bank of Negara Malaysia (BNM) • The Bank Negara Malaysia has developed the Sharī‘ah governance framework for Islamic Financial Institutions, where the main objective is to enhancing the role of the Sharī‘ah board, the Sharī‘ah Committee and the management in relation to Sharī‘ah matters. • The Sharī‘ah compliance in overall Islamic financial system is being achieved through the two-tier Sharī‘ah governance structure comprising two components 1. Centralized Sharī‘ah advisory body at the Central Bank 2. Internal Sharī‘ah Committee in each IFI. • The mandates of the Sharī‘ah Advisory Council, is to ascertain the Sharī‘ah rules relating to financial matter and issue fatawas on it. The SAC also advise the Bank and the Islamic Financial Institutions concerned on any Sharī‘ah issues relating to Islamic 10
11. finance and business activities or transactions . The duties of the internal Sharī‘ah Committee at the industry level in advising respective Islamic financial Institutions are further deliberated in the Guidelines on the Governance of Sharī‘ah Committee for the Islamic Financial Institutions issued in 2004. The Sharī‘ah Advisory Council of Bank Negara Malaysia (SAC) is a body established under section 51 of the Central Bank of Malaysia Act 2009 that has positioned the SAC as the apex authority for the determination of Islamic law for the purposes of Islamic financial business. 10. Conclusion Islamic Sharī‘ah law doesn't preclude the significance from securing administration and it is fitting and the foundation of a proper warning component and inside the system can be made to permit the parts to be cared for by SAC/SSB. The coordination between the SAC and the SSB Islamic is twice as simple as it is simpler to make a good domain for better administration of the Sharr`iah. Structure and be mindful so as not to turn into an Islamic smaller scale when both are at the correct temperature. A decent system is entrenched as the Sharī‘ah law, the Islamic government f. Usage of all administrations of the Sharī‘ah and structures of the items and in the activities for harms, the inner and outside of the candidate, with the goal that the seriousness of the outing, a decent man and the products of the structure of the rules. The Sharī‘ah government, the Islamic worry for additional improvement of the monetary structure, concerns the well. The authority of Islamic banks and the organization of Shar'iah law are on a very basic level at risk for original encroachment of Shar'iah law in Islamic banks. They have fail to make comprehensive accounting, regulatory and Shar'iah rules to ensure increasingly conspicuous consistency, duty and obligation regarding global Islamic financial practices. They demonstrated no pure energy for working up their dynamic and individual authority with specific data and capacities in Sharr'iah. Bank stores and Islamic customers are too reluctant to even consider about taking the risk of procuring or advancing money with PLS structures. Most of Muslim society and market players have genuine inquiries and inquiries concerning the ingenuity of overall Islamic finance practices. Islamic banks face the best test in setting up their exacting and good genuineness towards Islamic associations and systems. It is essential that Islamic banks really make Islamic and creative things and organizations to remain good and genuine substances in business and store. 11. Bibliography: Azmat, Saad, Michael Skully, and Kym Brown. “Can Islamic Banking Ever Become Islamic?” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 34 (2015): 253–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2015.03.001. Ayub, M., Khan, K., Rashid, A., Shahzad, M. A., & Rehman, D. H. ur. (2019). Enhancing the Competence and Effectiveness of Sharī„ah Advisory Boards : Case of Islamic Banking Institutions in Pakistan. Journal of Islamic Business and Management (JIBM), 9(1), 45–66. Banerjee, Arindam. Islamic Investments: Issues and Country Experiences. Hyderabad, India: Icfai Books, the Icfai University Press, 2010. Bashir, Muhammad. “Risk and Profitability Measures in Islamic Banks: the Case Study of Two Sudanese Banks.” Islamic Economic Studies 6, no. 2 (1999): 1–26. Haqqi, A. R. A. “Sharī‘ah Governance in Islamic Financial Institution: An Appraisal.” US-China Law Review 11 (2014): 112–33. Haron, S., and Ahmad, N. “The Effect of Conventional Interest Rate and Rate of Profit on Funds Deposited with Islamic Banking System in Malaysia.” International Journal of Islamic Services 1, no. 4 (2000): 1–9. Hasan, Z. Sharī’ah governance standard for Islamic financial institutions in Malaysia. Kolej Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Selangor (KUIS), Malaysia. 2007. Hasan, Zulkifli bin. Sharī‘ah Governance in Islamic Banks. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press, 2012. 11
12. Hasan , Zulkifli. “A Survey on Sharīc Ah Governance Practices in Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia, Gcc Countries and the Uk.” Islamic Banking and Financial Crisis, 2013, 200–221. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748647613.003.0011. Jawadi, Fredj, Nabila Jawadi, Hachmi Ben Ameur, and Abdoulkarim Idi Cheffou. “Does Islamic Banking Performance Vary across Regions? A New Puzzle.” Applied Economics Letters 24, no. 8 (2016): 567–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2016.1210764. Jawadi, Fredj, Nabila Jawadi, Hachmi Ben Ameur, and Abdoulkarim Idi Cheffou. “Does Islamic Banking Performance Vary across Regions? A New Puzzle.” Applied Economics Letters 24, no. 8 (2016): 567–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2016.1210764. John, Kose, and Lemma W Senbet. “Corporate Governance and Board Effectiveness.” Journal of Banking & Finance 22, no. 4 (1998): 371–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4266(98)00005-3. Kasim, N, Muhammad Ibrahim, S Hameed, and Muhammad Sulaiman. “Sharī‘ah Auditing in Islamic Financial Institutions: Exploring the Gap between the „Desirable‟ and the „Actual.‟” Global Economy and Finance Journal 2, no. 2 (2009): 127–37. Khan, Feisal. “How „Islamic‟ Is Islamic Banking?” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 76, no. 3 (2010): 805–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2010.09.015. Khan, Mohammad Mansoor, and Muhammad Ishaq Bhatti. “Developments in Islamic Banking,” 2008. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230582309. Laldin, Dr. Mohamad Akram. “The Role of Sharī‘ah Advisors in the Development of Islamic Securities.” Accessed July 30, 2020. http://www.iefpedia.com/english/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/The-Role-ofShari%C3%A2%E2%82%AC%E2%84%A2ah-Advisors-in-the-Development-of-IslamicSecurities12.pdf. Majeed, Muhammad Tariq, and Abida Zainab. “How Islamic Is Islamic Banking in Pakistan?” International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management 10, no. 4 (2017): 470–83. https://doi.org/10.1108/imefm-03-2017-0083. Nienhaus, V. “Profitability of Islamic PLS Banks Competing with Interest Banks: Problems and Prospects.” Journal of Research in Islamic Economics 1, no. 1 (1983): 37–47. Rafay, Abdul. Handbook of Research on Theory and Practice of Global Islamic Finance. Hershey, PA, USA: Business Science Reference, 2020. Shaharuddin, A. “Sharī‘ah Governance of Malaysian Islamic Banking Institutions.” Jurnal Ekonom 14, no. 2 (2011): 53–57. Shleifer, Andrei, and Robert Vishny. “A Survey of Corporate Governance.” The Journal of Finance 52, no. 2 (1997): 737–83. https://doi.org/10.3386/w5554. Shahzad, M. A. (2016). Book Review: Financial Institutions and Shariah Advisory Board, Need, Responsibilities and Rules: A Critical Review (Malyaati Adaray aour Sharī„ah Advisory Board: Zaroorat, Zumidarian aour Zawabat Tanqidi Jaiza). Quarterly Journal Fikr-O-Nazar; Islamic Research Institute; International Islamic University; Islamabad, 54(1–2), 234–241. Shahzad, M. A., & Khan, A. (2015, October 30). Sharī„ah Governance Framework in Islamic Financial Institutions: A Comparative Study of Pakistan and Malaysia. Shahzad, M. A., Khan, A., Mansoori, D. M. T., & Ehsan, A. (2020). Sharī„ah Governance in Islamic Banking Institutions in Pakistan : An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Islamic Business and Management (JIBM), 10(1). https://doi.org/10.26501/jibm/2020.1001-003 Shahzad, M. A., & Khan, R. (2019). External Sharī‟ah Auditors in Islamic Banking and Finance Industry : The Pakistan Accountant, The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Pakistan, (September), 49–51. https://doi.org/https://ssrn.com/abstract=3478878 Shahzad, M. A., & Rehman, D. H. ur. (2017). Sharī„ah Advisory in Islamic Bank‟s: An Analytical Study. FikrO-Nazar; Islamic Research Institute; International Islamic University; Islamabad., 54,(4), 111–142. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2891044 Shahzad, M. A., Rehman, H., Saeed, S. K., & Ehsan, A. (2019). Islamic Finance Education and Curricula of Deeni Madaris (Religious Seminaries): An Exploratory Study. Islamic Banking and Finance Review, 6, 59–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32350/ibfr.2019.06.04 Uddin, Md Akhter. “Are Sharī‘ah Governance and Risk Management Important? A Case of Islami Bank Bangladesh Ltd.” Journal of Islamic Banking and Finance 35, no. 2 (2018): 68–83. Wan Mohd Fathi Wan Nor Iffah, K Ghani Erlane, Said Jamaliah, and Puspitasari Evita. “Potential Employee Fraud Scape in Islamic Banks: The Fraud Triangle Perspective.” Global Journal Al Thaqafah 7, no. 2 (2017): 79–93. https://doi.org/10.7187/gjat122017-3. 12